Relocation out of state custody attorney

A proposed move out of state is the application most likely to reopen a settled arrangement, because it makes the existing schedule impossible rather than merely inconvenient. Both parents are on a clock from the moment notice is given, and the case is won or lost on the quality of the proposal rather than on the strength of the feeling behind it. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. has practiced since 1997 and Mr. Sris is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747.

On This Page

Notice Starts Everything

In Virginia, Va. Code § 20-124.5 requires a parent intending to relocate in a way that would materially affect the existing custody or visitation arrangement to give 30 days’ advance written notice to the court and the other parent, with the notice filed with the court. The other parent may then seek modification before the relocation takes place.

Moving without notice is a breach of that requirement, and it is a poor way to begin a case in which you are about to ask a court’s permission. Where the other jurisdictions apply different notice provisions, those are established at the outset.

The Court Is Not Assessing Whether You May Move

This is the point most often misunderstood. A parent is free to move; the question before the court is whether the child moves, and what arrangement should apply if they do. Framing the case as a right to relocate misreads what is being decided and tends to produce a proposal that ignores the other parent’s relationship entirely.

The analysis is the statutory factors — in Virginia, Va. Code § 20-124.3 — applied to the proposed new arrangement. The relationship each parent has with the child, the role each has played, each parent’s propensity to support the child’s contact with the other, and the child’s needs including siblings and extended family all bear directly.

What a Persuasive Application Contains

A documented reason. An employment offer in writing, a specific educational opportunity, or family who will provide identified care carries weight that a general wish for a fresh start does not, and a reason that cannot be evidenced tends to be read as motivated by the litigation.

A concrete proposal for the other parent’s relationship. Extended blocks in school holidays, a defined virtual contact schedule, an allocation of travel cost, and arrangements for who accompanies a young child. A moving parent who arrives with that is answering the factor about supporting the child’s contact with the other parent; one who has not thought about it is answering it in the other direction.

Objecting Effectively

Act within the notice period. Evidence the existing pattern of involvement with documents rather than assertion — school records, appointments attended, the actual exercise of the schedule over time. Address the proposal on its practical merits, including travel time and cost for the child rather than for the adult.

And offer an alternative. Objecting without proposing anything is weaker than objecting while putting forward a workable arrangement, including a change in primary residence if the move proceeds. Courts respond better to a parent offering a solution than to one refusing a problem.

Frequently Asked Questions

What notice is required in Virginia?

Under Va. Code § 20-124.5, 30 days’ advance written notice to the court and the other parent of an intended relocation materially affecting the existing arrangement, with the notice filed with the court. The other parent may seek modification before the relocation occurs.

Can the court stop me moving?

No. A parent is free to move; the question is whether the child moves and on what arrangement. Framing the case as a right to relocate misreads what is being decided and usually produces a proposal that ignores the other parent’s relationship.

What reasons carry weight?

Documented ones — a written employment offer, a specific educational opportunity, family who will provide identified care. A general wish for a fresh start is weak, and a reason that cannot be evidenced is frequently read as motivated by the litigation rather than by the opportunity.

What should the proposal include?

Extended blocks in school holidays, a defined virtual contact schedule, an allocation of travel cost, and arrangements for who accompanies a young child. That directly answers the statutory factor about supporting the child’s contact with the other parent.

How do I object effectively?

Act within the notice period, evidence your actual involvement with documents rather than assertion, and address the proposal on its practical merits including travel time and cost for the child. Then offer an alternative rather than simply refusing.

Should I ask for primary residence if the move goes ahead?

It is frequently the stronger position. Courts respond better to a parent offering a workable solution than to one refusing a problem, and an objection paired with a realistic alternative gives the court something to order if it permits the move.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the owner and founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., which has practiced since 1997. He is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with the firm and handle matters alongside him.

Speak With Mr. Sris

The court decides whether the child moves, not whether you may, and the proposal for the other parent’s relationship carries the application. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747. Consultations are by appointment.

Last reviewed: August 24, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

The information on this page is general and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading it or by contacting the firm. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.